Personal Injury
In short
A New York wrongful death claim must be brought by the personal representative of the estate, appointed by Surrogate's Court, within two years of the date of death. Damages are limited to the distributees' pecuniary injuries, so grief, sorrow and loss of companionship are not recoverable. A separate survival claim covers the decedent's own conscious pain and suffering.
Only the personal representative of the estate. Not a spouse, not a parent, not a child, at least not in their own name. EPTL 5-4.1 gives the claim to the representative, who brings it for the benefit of the decedent’s distributees.
A personal representative is someone who has actually received letters from Surrogate’s Court. Being the surviving parent, or the named executor in a will, is not the same thing until the letters issue.
That matters more than it sounds, because of the next point.
Two years from the date of death. Not three.
The Grieving Families Act would have extended the period to three years and allowed families to recover for grief and emotional loss. It passed the Legislature and was vetoed. Four times.
| Session | Outcome |
|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Vetoed, memo 192 |
| 2023 | Vetoed, memo 151 |
| 2024 | Vetoed, memo 122 |
| 2025 | Passed both houses, then vetoed 5 December 2025, memo 87 |
The 2025 passage was widely reported. The December veto was not. As a result a number of sources still describe a three-year deadline and expanded damages as though they were law. As of August 2026 the statute is unamended. Anyone calendaring three years is calendaring a dismissal.
No, and this is where good cases die.
The two-year period is not tolled while a Surrogate’s Court application is pending. The Second Department restated this in 2025: the limitations period is not tolled during the pendency of the application for letters of administration.
So the practical sequence is unforgiving. The family grieves, then eventually consults a lawyer, then petitions Surrogate’s Court, and the estate proceeding takes months. All of that runs inside the two years, not alongside it. Start the Surrogate’s Court process early.
There is a narrow exception where the only distributee is a child, in which case the period can be tolled until there is someone able to bring the action. It does not apply where an adult distributee could have sought appointment and did not.
Two separate claims almost always travel together, and they compensate different people for different things.
| Wrongful death | Survival claim | |
|---|---|---|
| Whose loss | The distributees’ | The decedent’s own |
| Clock starts | Date of death | Date of injury |
| Deadline | 2 years | The underlying tort period, with a one-year floor after death |
| Recovers | Pecuniary loss: support, services, guidance, inheritance, funeral costs | Conscious pain and suffering before death |
| Money goes to | Distributees, in proportion to each one’s loss | The estate, then by will or intestacy |
Note the last row. Wrongful death proceeds are not divided equally among heirs. EPTL 5-4.4 distributes them in proportion to the pecuniary injury each distributee actually suffered, which can differ sharply between, say, a dependent minor child and an adult one.
Pecuniary injuries only. EPTL 5-4.3 is narrow, and New York is among the most restrictive states in the country on this.
Recoverable:
Not recoverable:
The Second Department restated the rule in May 2026: damages in a wrongful death action are limited to pecuniary injuries, with loss of support, voluntary assistance and expenses incidental to death recoverable. Loss of society, affection and conjugal fellowship are not.
This restriction is precisely what the Grieving Families Act was written to remove, and precisely what remains in force because it did not become law.
Yes, and it is often overlooked. New York courts treat the calculation as a question of fact for the jury that does not require exact dollars and cents proof. Relevant factors include the decedent’s age, character, earning capacity, life expectancy, and the circumstances of the distributees.
In a case involving a decedent with substantial earning years remaining, this element can exceed everything else in the claim.
It is the survival half, and it turns on a single question: was the decedent conscious between the injury and death?
Without legally sufficient proof of consciousness following an accident, the claim must be dismissed. The Court of Appeals has held so since 1994 and quoted the rule again as recently as October 2025.
Two points work in a family’s favor:
Then there is no wrongful death claim either, even if death occurred yesterday.
The statute allows the claim only against someone who “would have been liable to the decedent… if death had not ensued.” If the decedent could not have sued on the day they died, the representative cannot sue now. In a case from Nassau County, the Second Department dismissed a wrongful death claim filed well within two years of death because the underlying malpractice period had run during the decedent’s lifetime.
The reverse is more forgiving: if the personal injury claim was alive on the date of death, the wrongful death claim survives even though the injury claim itself has since gone stale.
The deadlines compress, and one detail runs differently than in an ordinary injury case.
The Long Island Rail Road is the trap. As an MTA subsidiary the LIRR is exempt from the notice of claim requirement for ordinary injury claims, which leads people to conclude no notice is ever needed. For wrongful death the statutes route the claim differently and a notice of claim is required. The prudent course is to serve it. See our guide on the notice of claim requirement.
No. The 2026 amendment that capped non-economic damages at 100,000 dollars for certain at-fault drivers expressly excludes actions for injuries resulting in death. Death is also still a listed category of serious injury, so the threshold is not an obstacle in a fatal case.
One genuinely open question remains. The same legislation added a rule barring recovery where an injured person’s fault exceeds the defendant’s, but by its terms it applies to actions for personal injury subject to the no-fault law. The pure comparative fault provision names wrongful death expressly while the new bar does not, which supports the reading that death claims remain purely comparative. The statute is only months old and no court has decided it. See comparative negligence in New York.
Letters are obtained from the Nassau County Surrogate’s Court where the decedent was domiciled in Nassau, since venue for estate proceedings is the county of domicile at death. The wrongful death action itself is brought in Supreme Court, Nassau County, in the Tenth Judicial District, with appeals to the Appellate Division, Second Department, whose decisions are binding here.
Related: deadlines for injury claims, notice of claim requirements, and personal injury representation on Long Island.
This guide is general information about New York law, not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and penalties change, and how the law applies depends on facts no webpage knows. Check the linked primary source, and speak with a lawyer about your own case.
Speak with a lawyer
The consultation is free and confidential, and the phone is answered around the clock.
(516) 294-1133
Toner Law Firm
100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 400
Garden City, New York 11530
Attorney Advertising. Nothing on this page is legal advice, and contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.