Personal Injury
In short
A claim against a New York public entity generally requires a sworn notice of claim served within 90 days of when the claim accrues. Serving it is a condition precedent to suing, so missing the deadline ends an otherwise strong case. The time to file suit is also shorter than usual, one year and 90 days rather than three years.
It is a short sworn document you must serve on a public entity, usually within 90 days, before you are allowed to sue it. General Municipal Law 50-e sets the deadline and the contents. Section 50-i makes serving it a condition precedent to the lawsuit.
That phrase is the whole point. It is not a formality and it is not a courtesy. A claim worth a great deal of money, against a defendant who was plainly at fault, is dismissed if the notice was never served. The merits never get reached.
The 90 days runs from when the claim accrues, which is ordinarily the date of the accident. It does not run from when you discovered how badly you were hurt, and it does not run from the day you hired a lawyer.
Only public defendants. A claim against a private driver, a private store, or a private property owner requires nothing like this.
| Defendant | Notice deadline | Deadline to sue |
|---|---|---|
| Nassau County | 90 days | 1 year and 90 days |
| Towns of Hempstead, North Hempstead, Oyster Bay | 90 days | 1 year and 90 days |
| Long Island school districts | 90 days | 1 year and 90 days |
| The MTA itself | 90 days | 1 year and 90 days |
| The Long Island Rail Road | None for ordinary injury claims | 1 year and 90 days |
| Nassau University Medical Center | 90 days | 1 year and 90 days |
| The State of New York | 90 days, in the Court of Claims | Court of Claims Act applies |
| Any private person or business | None | Generally 3 years |
Two rows in that table cause most of the trouble, and both are covered below.
For an ordinary injury claim, no, and a great many Long Island law firm pages state the opposite.
Public Authorities Law 1276(6) exempts MTA subsidiaries from the notice of claim requirement, and the Long Island Rail Road is a subsidiary. The Second Department confirmed this in Matter of Almeida v. City of New York, 227 A.D.3d 890 (2d Dep’t 2024), applying the Court of Appeals decision in Andersen v. Long Island Rail Road.
Three cautions before anyone relaxes:
Under 50-e(2) it must be in writing, sworn to by the claimant, and state:
Outside New York City the notice must not state a dollar amount. The public entity can serve a demand for that figure separately.
“The manner in which the claim arose” is where notices fail. A description vague enough to cover any accident anywhere gives the municipality nothing to investigate, and that becomes the argument against you later.
Under 50-e(3), by personal delivery or by registered or certified mail, to the person authorized to receive a summons for that entity. Mail service is complete on deposit.
Electronic service is available only in a city with a population over one million. It is not available for Nassau County, its towns, or Long Island school districts. Emailing a notice here does not serve it.
Because the notice of claim and the statute of limitations are two separate requirements, and both must be met. This is the single most common misunderstanding on this topic.
| Private defendant | Public entity | |
|---|---|---|
| Notice of claim | None | 90 days from accrual |
| Time to file suit | 3 years | 1 year and 90 days |
| Waiting period before suing | None | 30 days after the notice is served |
A timely notice does not save a case filed after one year and 90 days, and a suit filed inside that period does not cure a notice that was never served. Wrongful death against a municipality carries its own two-year period under 50-i(1)(c).
After the notice is served, the public entity may demand an examination of the claimant under oath under General Municipal Law 50-h. The demand must be served within 90 days of the notice and must give reasonable notice of the examination.
Attending is not optional. Section 50-h(5) says no action shall be commenced unless the claimant has complied with the demand, and the Court of Appeals held in Colon v. Martin, 35 N.Y.3d 75 (2020), that failure to comply generally warrants dismissal.
It functions like an early deposition, before you have seen the municipality’s records, and the transcript follows the case to trial.
Not necessarily over. Section 50-e(5) lets a court grant leave to serve a late notice. It is discretionary, and denials are common.
The factors the court weighs:
On prejudice, Matter of Newcomb v. Middle Country Central School District, 28 N.Y.3d 455 (2016), set the allocation: the claimant makes an initial showing of no substantial prejudice, and the burden then shifts to the public corporation to make a particularized evidentiary showing. Speculation is not enough. In Matter of Jaime v. City of New York, 41 N.Y.3d 531 (2024), the Court of Appeals reaffirmed Newcomb and made clear the showing must rest on admissible evidence, not an attorney’s assertions.
There is an outer limit. The extension cannot exceed the time to commence the action, so once one year and 90 days has run, leave can no longer be granted unless something tolled it.
Far less than people assume. Knowing an accident happened is not knowing the essential facts of the claim.
The entity must have known the facts underlying the theory of liability, not merely that someone was hurt. In Williams v. Nassau County Medical Center, 6 N.Y.3d 531 (2006), the Court of Appeals held that medical records alone do not supply actual knowledge unless they show that the staff inflicted the injury. Jaime confirmed that an entity’s mere possession or creation of records, or the involvement of its employees, does not establish it either.
Ignorance of the notice requirement itself is not a reasonable excuse.
Partly, and the distinction matters. Infancy does not excuse the 90-day notice. What CPLR 208 tolls is the statute of limitations, which in turn extends the window in which an application for leave to serve a late notice can still be made.
Courts generally look for a connection between the infancy and the delay. A parent’s failure to act is not automatically excused because the injured person was young.
Section 50-e(8) removes several categories from the requirement, including workers’ compensation claims, volunteer firefighter and ambulance worker benefit claims, and claims arising from child sexual offenses. Claims against the State of New York are not exempt but run on a separate track in the Court of Claims under its own statute, not under 50-e.
Claims against Nassau County, its towns, Long Island school districts, Nassau University Medical Center and the Long Island Rail Road are brought in Supreme Court, Nassau County, which sits in the Tenth Judicial District and appeals to the Appellate Division, Second Department. Claims against the State of New York go to the Court of Claims instead.
Related: how long you have to sue in New York and personal injury representation on Long Island.
This guide is general information about New York law, not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and penalties change, and how the law applies depends on facts no webpage knows. Check the linked primary source, and speak with a lawyer about your own case.
Speak with a lawyer
The consultation is free and confidential, and the phone is answered around the clock.
(516) 294-1133
Toner Law Firm
100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 400
Garden City, New York 11530
Attorney Advertising. Nothing on this page is legal advice, and contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.