Personal Injury
In short
Uninsured motorist coverage is required on every New York auto policy and applies when the at-fault driver had no insurance, fled and was never identified, or whose insurer disclaims. SUM coverage is optional and applies where the at-fault driver carried lower limits than your own. Both are claims against your own insurer, and both require proof of a serious injury.
You claim against your own policy. Every New York auto policy carries uninsured motorist coverage by law under Insurance Law 3420(f)(1). It applies when the at-fault driver had no insurance, when the vehicle was stolen or driven without permission, when the driver fled and was never identified, or when the other insurer denies coverage or goes insolvent.
A related but separate coverage, supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, usually called SUM, applies to the far more common situation: the other driver had insurance, but nowhere near enough.
| Uninsured motorist | SUM (underinsured) | |
|---|---|---|
| Required? | Yes, on every policy | Optional, but provided at your liability limits by default since June 2018 unless you signed a waiver |
| When it applies | No insurance, hit and run, or the other insurer disclaims | The other driver had insurance in a lesser amount than your own |
| Who pays | Your own insurer | Your own insurer |
| Extra proof | Physical contact and a 24-hour report, for hit and run | Exhaustion of the other driver’s limits |
| Serious injury needed? | Yes | Yes |
Both are contract claims against your own insurance company, which changes the procedure considerably.
Because the state minimum is low and has not moved in three decades.
New York requires only 25,000 dollars in bodily injury coverage per person and 50,000 dollars per accident. The last increase took effect in 1996. Bills to raise it have been introduced repeatedly and remain in committee, so despite periodic reporting to the contrary, the minimum has not changed.
A serious injury routinely exceeds 25,000 dollars in medical bills alone. SUM coverage on your own policy is what closes that gap, and it is inexpensive relative to what it protects.
No, and this is the single most common error written about SUM.
SUM pays the difference, not an additional amount. Your SUM limit is reduced by what you recovered from the at-fault driver.
| Amount | |
|---|---|
| Your SUM limit | $100,000 |
| Recovered from the at-fault driver | $25,000 |
| Maximum SUM payment | $75,000 |
| Total recovery | $100,000, not $125,000 |
The same logic blocks stacking across policies. If you are covered under more than one household policy, your recovery is capped at the highest single limit rather than the sum of them.
One important thing that is not deducted: no-fault benefits. Payments of first-party benefits for basic economic loss do not reduce what your insurer owes for pain and suffering or for economic loss above the basic amount.
By comparing the at-fault driver’s liability limit to your policy’s bodily injury liability limit, which is not necessarily the same number as your SUM limit.
The other driver’s limits must be less than yours. Equal limits do not trigger SUM, which the Court of Appeals confirmed in Matter of Allstate Insurance Co. v. Rivera, 12 N.Y.3d 602 (2009). Since 2018 those two figures are usually identical on a New York policy, but not where the insured signed a waiver to take less.
Yes, for both coverages, and people are frequently told otherwise.
For uninsured motorist coverage the requirement is in the statute itself. For SUM it comes from the prescribed policy endorsement, which the Court of Appeals upheld in Raffellini v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 9 N.Y.3d 196 (2007), holding that the insured must prove serious injury.
The argument that no threshold applies because you are suing your own insurer on a contract was the Appellate Division position in that case, and it was reversed. It is not the law.
The 2026 amendment reaches these claims too. Both coverages incorporate the serious injury definition by live reference, so when the 90/180 category was repealed from Insurance Law 5102(d) in May 2026, the threshold for UM and SUM claims narrowed with it. Someone whose only route past the threshold was that category now has none, and recovers nothing for pain and suffering even though economic loss above the basic amount is still payable. See our guide on the serious injury threshold.
The dangerous ones are not statutes of limitations. They are conditions in the policy.
If you had no policy of your own at all, a claim may lie with the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation instead, which runs on its own much shorter notice periods.
Not without your own insurer’s written consent, and getting this wrong forfeits the coverage. This is where more SUM claims are lost than anywhere else.
The endorsement excludes coverage where the insured settles with a liable party without written consent. The Second Department stated the consequence plainly in Matter of Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Co. v. Kanner, 103 A.D.3d 736 (2d Dep’t 2013): failing to obtain consent breaches the contract and disqualifies the insured from the benefits, unless the insurer waived the requirement or acquiesced.
There is a safe harbor, and it is narrow. Where the settlement is for the at-fault party’s full available limit, the insured may give written notice and, if 30 days pass without the insurer either consenting or advancing the money itself, may then settle. The Second Department applied that route in Unitrin Direct Insurance Co. v. Muriqi, 172 A.D.3d 1382 (2d Dep’t 2019).
Two related traps:
On exhaustion itself, the rule is more forgiving than people assume: exhausting the limits of any single liable party can be enough, rather than every policy involved.
Usually arbitration, which is faster, private, and heard without a jury.
The insured generally elects arbitration or a lawsuit, though where the SUM limit is only the statutory minimum either side may demand arbitration. Threshold coverage questions, such as whether there was physical contact in a hit and run, whether the other vehicle was insured, and whether notice was timely, are typically decided by a court on a petition to stay arbitration, sometimes after a hearing. The arbitrator then decides fault and damages.
Review of an arbitration award is very limited. An arbitrator’s mistake about the law is generally not a ground to vacate, which is worth understanding before choosing that route.
Nobody knows yet, and it is the most consequential open question in this area.
The 2026 amendment bars recovery in a motor vehicle “action” where the injured person’s fault is greater than the other side’s. A SUM arbitration is not an action; it is a contract proceeding against your own insurer. But the arbitrator has to decide what you would be legally entitled to recover from the at-fault driver, and the driver’s defenses flow into that question.
The mechanically likely result is that a SUM claimant found more than half at fault recovers nothing rather than a reduced award. No court has decided it. A related question, whether an arbitration demand counts as a proceeding “commenced” for the amendment’s timing rule, is equally unresolved.
Anyone stating either point confidently is predicting, not reporting. See comparative negligence in New York.
Petitions to stay or compel SUM arbitration, and hearings on physical contact, coverage and notice, are brought in Supreme Court, Nassau County, at 100 Supreme Court Drive in Mineola. Nassau sits in the Tenth Judicial District, and appeals go to the Appellate Division, Second Department, whose decisions on consent to settle and hit and run proof are the controlling authority here.
Related: the serious injury threshold, deadlines for injury claims, and personal injury representation on Long Island.
This guide is general information about New York law, not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and penalties change, and how the law applies depends on facts no webpage knows. Check the linked primary source, and speak with a lawyer about your own case.
Speak with a lawyer
The consultation is free and confidential, and the phone is answered around the clock.
(516) 294-1133
Toner Law Firm
100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 400
Garden City, New York 11530
Attorney Advertising. Nothing on this page is legal advice, and contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.