Criminal Defense
In short
At arraignment a New York judge must issue a securing order choosing among release on recognizance, release under non-monetary conditions, or bail. Bail is available only where the charge is a statutory qualifying offense, and release on recognizance is the presumption otherwise. The standard is reasonably assuring your return to court rather than dangerousness.
The judge must issue a securing order, which is the decision about whether and on what terms you are released while the case is pending. There are three possibilities:
| Outcome | When it is available |
|---|---|
| Release on your own recognizance | The default in every case that is not a qualifying offense |
| Release under non-monetary conditions | Where release on recognizance will not reasonably assure your return to court |
| Bail, or remand | Only where the charge is a qualifying offense. Remand additionally requires that it be a felony |
Release on recognizance is a presumption, not a courtesy. Under CPL 510.10(3) the court “shall” release you on your own recognizance unless it finds, on the record or in writing, that doing so will not reasonably assure your return.
No. Bail may only be set where the charge appears on a statutory list of qualifying offenses. On everything else the court is limited to release, with or without conditions.
The list is longer and less intuitive than people assume:
The claim that bail was eliminated for all misdemeanors is false. Several categories reach misdemeanors directly.
One recent clarification worth knowing: in February 2026 the Second Department held that the provision covering offenses committed while under supervision reaches probation and post-release supervision, but not parole. Being on parole does not by itself make an otherwise non-qualifying felony bail-eligible.
Not when setting bail in the first place. Sometimes, later, on a motion to revoke. Both halves of that answer get stated wrongly.
The securing order statutes do not contain the words dangerousness, public safety, or danger to the community. The question the court is answering is whether you will come back to court, and the factors it weighs are directed at that.
But the analysis is different once someone is already released. Where a defendant at liberty on a felony is alleged to have committed a new violent or class A felony, the Court of Appeals held in 2024 that a court may consider the danger the defendant poses to the community, provided it holds the hearing the statute requires. In that context, flight risk factors are not the relevant ones.
So “judges may consider dangerousness” and “judges may never consider dangerousness” are both wrong. The answer depends on which decision is being made.
No, not any more, and this is the single most common error in published material about New York bail.
The “least restrictive alternative” requirement was part of the 2019 reforms. It was repealed effective 2 June 2023. The phrase no longer appears anywhere in the securing order statutes.
What replaced it: the court must make an individualized determination about risk of flight, consider the kind and degree of control or restriction necessary to reasonably assure return to court, select a securing order consistent with that determination, and explain the basis on the record or in writing.
The Court of Appeals confirmed this in October 2025, faulting a trial judge who had recited “least restrictive means,” describing it plainly as the old legal standard. The same decision noted the judge had also looked to the wrong statute for the factors.
That matters practically. Articles reciting the least restrictive standard, or listing the factors from the repealed provision, are describing law that has not applied for over three years.
From CPL 510.10(1), not from the section people usually cite. The provision that used to carry the factor list was hollowed out in 2023 and is now essentially a cross reference.
The current factors are directed at return to court and include your activities and history, your ties to the community, your record of responding to court appearances, any history of violating orders of protection, any history involving firearms, and the charges you face.
The list is not exclusive. Courts may weigh other genuinely relevant information, but only where it bears on the likelihood that you will return.
Bail is not just cash. CPL 520.10 provides nine forms, including cash, an insurance company bail bond, secured and partially secured bonds, unsecured bonds, and payment by credit card.
Two rules matter more than the list:
Cash may always be posted in the amount set, even where the order did not specify it.
Conditions are the middle option, and they are meant to be tailored rather than imposed from a menu. They can include supervision by pretrial services, travel restrictions or passport surrender, no contact with witnesses, counseling or treatment programming, maintaining employment or housing, obeying an order of protection, and electronic monitoring.
Several protections apply:
Electronic monitoring is a last resort by statute. It requires an individualized finding that you fall within a defined eligible category and that no other realistic condition will suffice. It is capped at 60 days, renewable only after a fresh determination, and it cannot be run by a for-profit company. A person on electronic monitoring is treated as in custody for certain timing rules.
Yes, through two different routes, and the procedure differs.
| Route | Trigger | What is required |
|---|---|---|
| Good cause | Any securing order | A summary hearing, on a flight-risk rationale |
| New serious felony | A felony defendant at liberty allegedly commits a class A or violent felony, or intimidates a witness | Reasonable cause, plus a mandatory hearing with evidence and cross-examination. Detention capped at 90 days |
| Specified violations | Persistent and willful failure to appear, violating an order of protection, or committing a felony while at liberty on a felony | Clear and convincing evidence, plus a hearing |
There is also a protection people rarely know about: except where a new crime is charged, and absent credible evidence that a missed appearance was willful, the court must give at least 48 hours notice before issuing a bench warrant.
The remedy is a habeas corpus proceeding challenging the securing order. Two realistic expectations:
In practice the Second Department, which covers Nassau County, has done all of these in recent cases: remitted for a compliant determination, set bail itself in three forms with conditions, ordered release on recognizance with conditions, and dismissed the petition.
Two timing rules matter if you are in custody:
Every Nassau criminal case is arraigned at Nassau County District Court, 99 Main Street in Hempstead, misdemeanors and felonies alike, because the District Court holds preliminary jurisdiction over felonies.
Two practical points:
Felony cases move up to Nassau County Court at 262 Old Country Road in Mineola, and in some matters to Supreme Court, Nassau County, once indicted. People held in custody are at the Nassau County Correctional Center in East Meadow.
Related: what happens at an arraignment, desk appearance tickets, and criminal defense in Nassau County.
This guide is general information about New York law, not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and penalties change, and how the law applies depends on facts no webpage knows. Check the linked primary source, and speak with a lawyer about your own case.
Speak with a lawyer
The consultation is free and confidential, and the phone is answered around the clock.
(516) 294-1133
Toner Law Firm
100 Garden City Plaza, Suite 400
Garden City, New York 11530
Attorney Advertising. Nothing on this page is legal advice, and contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.